Make your own free website on

Messages from Michael L. Morton

Bruce Cornet and Michael discuss D & M Pyramid

In a message dated 10/02/2000 7:30:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, writes:

Dear Michael,
You state on your web page entitled Bulletin #5: "For that matter ... 
WHY did he do 'nothing' with this information, after I sent it to him in Spring of 1998 ? 
I've asked him about that, via email... and he has not replied to my satisfaction. 
I also sent him very significant figures for "The D&M Pyramid II" ... etc. 
Well ... I think he got scared ... and/or was "gotten-to" by someone. 
He could have been seriously threatened."
Actually, the reason why the Cydonia II webpage was archived and made 
inaccessible is because it was hurting my chances at making inroads (friends) 
at JPL and NASA with engineers and scientists, who hold strong opinions about 
the Cydonia features and face on Mars.  In short, my Cydonia II webpage made 
me look like a kook!  They suggested that I remove it.  I thought it was a 
good suggestion, and complied.
The reason why I never took advantage of your information, which still 
intrigues me, is that even the slightest error in measurement will throw any 
calculations to NINE DECIMAL PLACES!!!! off to the point that those numbers 
are meaningless.  So, there is no way that you could prove their significance 
unless you could show that your measurement process is infallible to nine 
decimal places.  In any scientific endeavor, you must take into account 
standard deviation and margin for error.  Because you didn't, I had no trust 
in your results, as exciting as they might be.
Thought I should answer your questions so that you do not think that some 
spooks or perps got me :-)
Yours truly,
Bruce Cornet, Ph.D.
Geologist, Paleobotanist, and Palynologist
27 Tower Hill Ave.
Red Bank, NJ  07701
732-747-9244     >>
Hi Bruce ...    I'm glad to hear from you.
Thank-you for letting me know the reason for your taking down the
"Cydonia Analogue" material. It was quite disturbing to me, when I
saw that you were removing that material, and that you were issuing
a "retraction" regarding the material.  Again .. I appreciate your emailing
me with your reason for it.

I can understand your problem with the 9 decimal places .. the 
figures in my work are not quantitatively justified, in the 
currently-accepted'scientific method' .. and I can understand this. 

However, I do maintain that I have qualitatively justified my work.
By that, I mean the descriptions of several significant correlations,
specifically regarding the "Grid Matrix" numbers of "Earthface" (Face II),
the "Tholus II", and the "D&M II".

For example .. the "25920" Grid LONG (W.Giza) of "Earthface" (Face II) ..
is a very conspicuous figure, of course .. the Earth precession cycle in 

And the Grid POINT Value of "Earthface" .. 1.234567901 ... is also a very
'conspicuous' figure .. indicating both the "Square" of 1.111111111 .. and 
also the integers of our base 10 system (minus the "8", only because of my use of 
10 digits in the Square Root) ... which is 1.111111111, of course, and which
is ALSO the apparent Grid POINT Value of "Tholus II".  As you can see, 
I am *qualitatively* showing, here, a set of very direct, very specific, and
very 'significant' .. correlations.

{ 1.11111111  X  1.11111111  =  1.234567899 }.

Further .. the Grid LONG of "Earthface" .. 25920 .. is very directly ..
and very *conspicuously* resonant .. with the Grid POINT Value
(Munck, 1992) of 'The Face' at Cydonia (656.56127) on Mars ...
25920 / 656.56127  =  39.4784176 .. exactly (2Pi) Squared.

This is mainly to point out that the "quality of information" is very 
in this work.

Bruce ... thanks, again, for emailing. 

Michael Lawrence Morton

-- Michael Lawrence Morton (c) 2000 

-- Michael Lawrence Morton