Michael Lawrence Morton
Orion Belt-stars Composite = (Mars * Jupiter) ..
Mon Jan 20 22:50:36 2003
64.12.96.74

Would you believe it ? 

I'll show you the details.

And .. I'll tell you .. I've_already_used this "arrangement" ..
because I've had some trouble remembering my derived "ASM" AU
for Jupiter. 

If you'll recall .. (ALNITAK * MINTAKA) / ALNILAM ..
= (43.63323131 * 31.00627668) / 170.010936 ..
= 7.957747155 .. which I call the "Orion Belt-stars Composite". {ASM}.

Now .. even_before_I noticed the special congruence with_7.957747155_ ..
I decided that 5.20456899 works better than 5.208333333 as the AU
for Jupiter. (Do I sound like a 'planner' on the Solar System Creation Council,
or what ?) 

It was only_later_that I noticed this ..

(1.528992539 * 5.20456899) = 7.957747155
Mars Jupiter

I mean .. "there it is". Self-evident.
And there's even a "belt" between Mars and Jupiter ..
just as those 3 particular Orion stars_comprise_a "belt". 
And that "belt" between Mars and Jupiter happens to_include_the
*orbit-slot* of the former TIAMAT, IMO .. as I do agree with Zecharia Sitchin's
basic thesis. And EARTH just happens to be, apparently, a "rehabbed remnant"
of the former TIAMAT.

Of course .. that "belt" between Mars and Jupiter_would_be a *very* important
place .. historically, if-in-fact there is a NIBIRU as a companion-star to Sol,
as part of a binary star-system .. and, in-which-case there have been certain
'humans' (in the Galactic sense) who have lived on one or more "planetoids" tightly
orbiting this sub brown-dwarf (NIBIRU) .. and, in-which-case said 'humans' have
also been on Mars_and_on the specially-rehabbed chunk of the former TIAMAT.

I need to explain, again, here .. that I was inspired by being referred (by Robert
Carl) to the websites which show and which attempt to explain the "Stonehenge
Equation" .. also called the "Solar System Creation Equation".
{{ Creation doesn't have to_automatically_connect "directly" to "God",
and_by-pass_everything-and-anything ELSE_*between*_"us" Earth humans 
and the "Ultimate-Creator-of-All-That-Is" .. does it ?? }}
I mean .. what if "humans", on an Intergalactic mode/scale .. have been around for ..
ohh, say, 10 or 15 billion years ? (At least) ? I think they'd have been able to
design and create star-systems .. maybe even whole galaxies .. 4 to 5 billion
years ago. (Think of the Cremo & Thompson evidence .. metallic balls found
in geological strata .. in-situ .. in strata 2.5_billion_years old). 
After all .. "we" seem to be barely scratching the surface in our re-discovery
of advanced knowledge which seems to have been elegantly and redundantly
encoded on EARTH .. and in the_sky_of EARTH as well.

Allegedly .. someone named G.E.S. Curtis was able to come up with a certain
equation (1980 ?) .. after noticing the layout of STONEHENGE.
After studying this equation, recently .. I experimented with using certain "ASM"
figures in-place-of certain_AU_distances indicated in this "Stonehenge Equation"
of G.E.S. Curtis .. for particular planets, etc.
What I found, as a result of this particular experimenting .. is more and more
of the "ASM". Precise, specific, cross-correlating data .. all consistent with
the "ASM".

As for reference materials .. please go to ..
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/stoneequation/index.htm?mtbrand=AOL_US

Also to ..
http://www.geocities.com/godisreal_uk/primer.htm

And also to ..
http://www.geocities.com/godisreal_uk/mathone.htm
-------------------------------------------------------

One major point I'd like to make, here, is .. that there_is_this "Curtis Equation"
in existence .. since 1980, supposedly. 
In other words .. there_is_a working equation in "the literature", if you will ..
*in-addition-to* the "ASM" and the "Pyramid Matrix". 
People have said that I'm just "making this stuff up" .. and "manipulating numbers"
to "make it work out".
Well .. is G.E.S. Curtis_also_just "making this up" ?
Is Munck just "making this up" .. for over 20 years, now ?

Please go to the above websites, and notice how closely I've "substituted"
certain ASM figures .. for the "Curtis" figures.
I don't think you'll be able to honestly say that I'm "stretching" it.

Here are some examples of planetary AU interactions ..
using particular ASM figures for AUs ..

Mercury * Mars .. 
(0.3872983346 * 1.528992539) = 0.5921762641 ..
which is a decimal-harmonic of .. the_arc-seconds-tag_on the Ecliptic
longitude of South Galactic Node in the ASM ..
05(deg) * 18(min) * 59.21762641(sec) E.ALNITAK ..
= 5329.586377 E.ALNITAK ..
= 540 * (Pi^2).
And this Ecliptic-longitude is_also_that of June Solstice of circa 2000 A.D. ..
see my work on this.

Venus * Jupiter ..
(0.72 * 5.20456899) = (11.77245771 / 3.141592654) .. 
with 11.77245771 being_exactly_5 times the 2.354491542 AU for the
former TIAMAT. 

And then you might notice that 11.77245771 is a decimal-harmonic of
the_exact_RATIO of the RADIUS (in regular Feet) of the Sarsen Circle of
STONEHENGE and the_360_system's Radian-arc value of 57.29577951(deg) ..
(57.29577951 / 48.66934411) = 1.177245771

Mars * Uranus ..
(1.528992539 * 19.2) ..
= 29.35665675 = [103.68 / (Pi^4)] * 27.58106915 ..
= [D.C.White House Grid LAT / (10^3)] / (Pi^4) ..
* (Grid Point Value of D&M Pyramid of Cydonia on Mars).

For those if you who haven't seen these, yet .. here are my ASM-AU figures
for all of the planets, including the former TIAMAT.
Yes .. I think the_2.354491542_also applies to NIBIRU's perihelion passage.

MERCURY .. 0.3872983346 .. (Sqrt 15) / 10.
VENUS .. 0.72
EARTH .. Unity .. 1
MARS .. 1.528992539
Former TIAMAT .. 2.354491542
JUPITER .. 5.20456899
SATURN .. (30 / 3.141592654) = 9.549296586
URANUS .. 19.2
NEPTUNE .. 30
PLUTO .. (2Pi)^2 = 39.4784176

-- Michael Lawrence Morton 

(c) 2002 by mailto:Milamo@aol.com Michael Lawrence Morton ~ Archeocryptographer.

https://matrix-messenger.tripod.com/index.htm
http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/homepage1.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm
http://disc.server.com/Indices/164905.html

---