Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Michael Lawrence Morton's

Matrix Message 394

05 Degrees Offset from True-North Celestial North Pole ..


Michael Lawrence Morton
05 Degrees Offset from True-North Celestial North Pole ..
Mon Mar 31 15:30:09 2003
205.188.209.112


I am truly indebted to the work of Greg Rigby,
who wrote the book, "On Earth As it is in Heaven" ..
subtitled; "Revelations of French Cathedral Locations" ..
ISBN 1900706 008
Copyright 1996 .. Rhaedus Publications. Hardcover.

In Appendix 14 and Appendix 15 .. Greg Rigby shows
graphics of the alignments of 2 stars in "The Plough"
(or "Big Dipper") of Ursa Major .. MERAK and DUBHE ..
already (as of Circa 2000 A.D. present era) aligned
to true-North Celestial North Pole in our Earth-sky.
Then; the other key, here .. is how Rigby shows the
Earth-precessional "apparent-movement" of POLARIS ..
in Appendix 14 as of 2000 A.D., and_then_as of 2500 A.D.
in Appendix 15. Essentially, the ("linear") sky-alignment
of MERAK and DUBHE .. (and of an imaginary line then
extending from those 2 stars) .. is unchanged from 2000
A.D. to 2500 A.D. But when you then notice the "apparent
movement" of POLARIS (due to Earth's precession) from
2000 A.D. to 2500 A.D., you can see an angular
displacement of .. 05 degrees .. "during" that 500 years
of projected Earth-precession. Not only that ..
you can also see that as of 2500 A.D. POLARIS will be
essentially_ALIGNED_with MERAK, DUBHE, *and* True-
North Celestial Pole. So; from 2000 A.D. .. the "apparent"
Earth-sky "precessional-movement" of POLARIS is 05
degrees, based on the_360_system .. (!!!) .. and ALSO
moves POLARIS into direct_ALIGNMENT_with ..
1) MERAK
2) DUBHE
3) True-North Celestial Pole.
The "line-up" will be .. as of 2500 A.D. ..
from S. to N. Celestial Sphere, respectively ..
MERAK, DUBHE, POLARIS, North Celestial Pole.

What I'm leading-up-to, here, is .. Greg Rigby's work,
in the above book, clearly and meticulously shows that
this_05 degrees_offset .. as I_just_described above,
is EXACTLY displayed in a_huge_arrangement on the
ground in France .. which can_NOW_be verified via an
AERIAL-survey of photography and/or video. 
This verification involves some very_famous_locations
on the ground in France.
This_05 degrees_offset angle CORRESPONDS to "Circa 2000
A.D." .. or .. "NOW". {{ As Above, So Below }}.
The ground-locations actually span_hundreds_of miles.

The POLARIS ground-location is the_church_at Rennes-le-
Chateau. The DUBHE ground-location is Chartres Cathedral.
The MERAK ground-location is a place called "Bonne Mare".
All of this is very much detailed in Rigby's book.

Now .. I think it might be interesting .. to 'project'
the ground-location of True-North Celestial Pole ..
*from* the diagrams in Appendices 14 and 15.
I have not actually done this (yet) .. because I
*just-now* thought of it, only this moment. (-;

Is not 2500 A.D. the *projected-limit* of the "sky-
culmination" of ORION ?
And isn't the "Orion Belt-stars Composite" (figure)
the_ratio_of .. (25 / Pi) = 7.957747155 .. ?? ..
where 25 is a decimal-harmonic of 2500 .. ?? 

The_ground-location_ALIGNMENT, which can NOW be observed
from AERIAL-view .. will show an imaginary line from
the_church_at Rennes-le-Chateau .. all the way through
Chartres Cathedral .. and on to the "Bonne Mare" site,
in France .. *AND* .. this imaginary line will ALSO
then be observed to be_05 degrees_offset from True-North
orientation on EARTH itself !! 
BUT .. bear in mind, that the ground-arrangement is
spanning_hundreds_of miles. This would mean that the
aerial-photographers (or observers) would need to be
very high-up in the air. Maybe necessary for satellite-
technology to do this ? Probably.
There should be satellite images_already_available,
to confirm this .. (yes/no)!?

This ALL should (hopefully) resonate in a relatively
precise_numerical_way .. with the "ASM" .. according
to my work. I mean .. *mathematically* .. not in the
pejorative sense of "numerology". Actually .. I am
way-beyond a pejorative connotation for 'numerology',
as I'm sure many of you are ny now. (See the works
of Gary Val Tenuta). 

The "Nineveh Number" is ..
1.959552 * (10^14).

(55987.2 / 195.9552) = 285.7142857

And_285.7142857_displays a numerical_order_which
is involved in a mathematical resonance with ..
the number 7.
This_order-pattern_is the ordered series of digits ..
"714285" .. or .. "285714", for another example.

But please notice .. 
this_particular_ordered-cycle .. "2857142857" ..
allows for this .. 
(285.7142857 * 7) = 2000 .. as in "2000" A.D.

Using the_light-speed_decimal-harmonic from the work of
Bruce Cathie ..
(55987.2 / 162) = 345.6

{{ For those with (current) eyes to see ..
(55987.2 * 1.736111111) = 97200

(55987.2 / 113.4537875) = 493.48022

(162000 / 1.736111111) = 93312

(14804.4066 / 1.736111111) = (2.368705056 * 3600) 

(93312000 / 25920) = 3600 }}.
--------------------------------------

NOW ..

345.6 = (21.6 * 16) ..
= (21.6 * 11.4591559 * 1.396263402)

Where; 21.6 = POLARIS @ Y2K ..
11.4591559 = MERAK @ Y2K ..
and 1.396263402 = DUBHE @ Y2K.

Recall the_05 degrees_offset angle ?

(345.6 * 5) = 1728 

(345.6 / 5) = 69.12

(1728 / 69.12) = 25

"25" ? Decimal-harmonic of .. 2500 .. correct ?
As in .. "2500" A.D.

For designating a "number in degrees" for the True-North
Celestial Pole ? How about "360" ?

(360 / 5) = 72 .. the "ideal" number of EARTH-years
to account for 1 degree .. in the_360_system ..
of Earth-precessional 'movement'.

Is this not a reference to the "Pentagram" discussed
in great detail by David Wood, in his book, "Genisis" ?

(360 * 345.6 * 5) = (24 * 25920)

Now if I bring "ISIS/SIRIUS" into this mathematically-
encoded situation ..

(24 * 25920) / 2.368705056 = (656.56127 * 400)

400 = (SOL's Diameter / LUNA's Diameter) ..
= (864000 / 2160) in "mean-ideal" Statute miles.
We (on EARTH) see this expressed as an Earth-centric
celestial metaphor, during a Total Solar Eclipse.
The 2 disks exactly "converge" .. into One.

656.56127 is the {Munck, 1993} Grid Point Value for
the "FACE ONE" on MARS, at Cydonia.
Is it not_human_awareness that understands this
celestial metaphor, when SOL and LUNA get together ?

-- Michael Lawrence Morton 

--------------

Michael Lawrence Morton
Is the 2500 an Approximation of 2368 A.D. ?
Tue Apr 1 10:35:56 2003
205.188.209.144


If you use the "ideal" of 72 Earth-years per degree
of Earth-precession .. then 05 degrees of "ideal/mean"
Earth-precession takes 360 years.
(5 * 72) = 360.

What I'm suggesting, of course, is that the "2500"
A.D. figure used by many people as the
"culmination of Orion", etc. ..
just might be an_ENCODED_"approximation".

The "2500 A.D." could very well be an *encoded
approximation* meant as a "guide" to use in
"decoding" this "ASM" itself.

I suggest that "2500 A.D." might be an encoded-
approximation to assist in guiding "us" .. NOW ..
in deciphering all of this 'matrix' material.

2368 A.D. is only 132 Earth-years "off" of 2500 A.D.

I've already proposed that_2368 A.D._is encoded as the
"true-and-intended" beginning of the Age of Aquarius.
We already know that "2368" is the classical-gematrian
number that translates as "Jesus Christ" in the
Greek-gematria. As I've written before on the Internet,
2000 + 360 + 8 = 2368. This is where the '360' is
referencing 360 "mean/ideal" years of Earth-
precession .. and where the "8" is referencing the 8
years from 07 B.C. to (and including) Year One A.D. ..
the "Jesus the Christ" element, according to Laurence
Gardner's work (also ref. Barbara Thiering) .. if 07 B.C.
is the birth year.

I already (in the previous email) showed the
"ISIS/SIRIUS" figure of 2.368705056 .. the Y2K Grid
Point Value of SIRIUS. This is a_decimal-harmonic_of
2368.705056 .. corresponding to around the 15th of
September of 2368 A.D. .. a week prior to September
Equinox. "Septa" .. "September" .. "seven".
7 days in the week.
Isn't SIRIUS associated with a "7-Pointed-Star" symbol
in at least one major ancient tradition ?

We are_NOW_at a little more than_05 degrees_of ecliptic-
longitudinal Earth-precession "from" the Age of Aquarius,
according to the Sidereal Zodiac. 
So; here's the_05 degrees_again .. that I just
referenced in the preceding email (article).

25 is 1/4th of 100 .. a "quarter" of a century in years.
And 1/4th of a Circle is HALF-Pi Radians-of-arc.

15 time-minutes is 1/4th of a time-hour.
The_right-angle_is then 15 minutes before and after
the "12" and the "6" on the "clock-face".
--------------------------

It might be .. that the "linear alignment" of 
MERAK, DUBHE, POLARIS, and True-Nortg Celestial Pole
doesn't actually "appear" in our Earth-sky until 2500
A.D. .. *even though* .. EVEN THOUGH .. the *ecliptic-
longitudinal* precession_was_05 degrees (plus) in 368
years from 2000 A.D. to 2368 A.D.
By this .. I mean .. it could be that the actual 
"line-of-sight"_alignment_of those 4 sky-locations
doesn't "appear" until 2500 A.D. .. because it's so
"far" from the celestial equator.
(This is bit difficult to put into words, at this moment).

-- Michael Lawrence Morton 

(c) 2003 by mailto:Milamo@aol.com Michael Lawrence Morton ~ Archeocryptographer.

http://matrix-messenger.tripod.com/index.htm
http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/homepage1.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm
http://disc.server.com/Indices/164905.html