Matrix Message 421

"Clifford's Hill" Crop-Form Revised

Michael Lawrence Morton "Clifford's Hill" Crop-Form Revised Mon Jun 23 21:23:48 2003 205.188.209.106 Please remember what I've said .. that this is essentially "work-in-progress". So; in a sense, I can "dismiss" the specific "crop-formation" figures, themselves (as "pertaining directly to this Clifford's Hill" crop-formation) .. as a .. "false_portion_of the Alert" .. (Part 13 of my "ALERT Series"). But .. in another sense; I can say that I learned some things during that "false Part-13 ALERT". And; I can also say that the numbers, looked-at during that "false Part-13 ALERT" .. are very much_still_valid and very important, in-and-of- themselves as far as the_"ASM"_is concerned !! This was instructional. AND; now .. I have_revised_the figures for this (June, 2003) "Clifford's Hill" crop- formation .. *specifically-based-on* Robert Carl's mapping expertise, and .. also thanks to a_"NEW"_OS Grid Reference which *just-very-recently* appeared on the CropCircleConnector website, for this "Clifford's Hill" formation. Are we learning ? I think so. At first, the CropCircleConnector website did_not_have the more-accurate OS Grid Ref that it now_does_have. This greatly helped us, in our work .. because it enabled Robert Carl to coordinate it with other mapping- aerials. In a while, here .. you'll see how far "off" the first "Streetmap" coordinates are/were, and unfortunately I_followed_them .. mainly because it seemed to me that they were more-accurate than they_really_were .. being that it now appears that someone forged the original OS Grid Refs in terms of the arc-seconds. This did_not_help us. We need a conscientious, real attempt to get it right. This is_serious_work. Please .. stop forging coordinates and/or OS Grid Refs. We really need_good_data, not forged data. We are working with accuracies of within 10 feet .. or are *trying-to*, at least. We_do_work with such accuracies in terms of locations of structures such as Stonehenge, Silbury Hill, Avebury Circle, etc. If you want good science, it must start in the field .. with good, accurate measurements. We, here .. as archaeocryptographers .. are dependent on the field- measurements data. I just received an email, today, as I write this, from Robert Carl. Because of the "suddenly" *new-and- improved* data on the_"Clifford's Hill"_crop-formation on the Internet ("Streetmap"-linked to the CropCircleConnector), Robert C. was able to cross- reference (visually-via-map-graphics) and come-up with a pair of coordinates he said would be accurate to within "10 meters" or so. When I then looked at the coordinates, I noticed that they are some_16_arc-seconds different on latitude, and are some_07_arc-seconds different on longtitude .. from the *initially-given* coordinates on "Streetmap"-linked-to-CropCircleConnector. 16 arc-seconds difference on latitude !! .. that's more than a_quarter_of an arc-minute !! That's well-over 1600_feet_"off". This is outrageously sloppy forgery. 07 arc-seconds "off" on longitude .. that's about 430 feet off, or so. What we'd like is .. some sort of systematic GPS-Unit readings to be taken .. as a matter of routine procedure. Most decent GPS-Units will give readings good to within 3 meters or so. Please. -------------------------------- REVISED-CORRECTED .. "Clifford's Hill" Crop-formation .. Reported on 15th June, 2003 .. All Cannings, Wiltshire. Robert Carl today (23rd June, 2003) sent me an email with his coordinates (see above references to this) for this "Clifford's Hill" crop-formation. "To within 10 meters" .. 51 deg 21 min 57.9 sec North. 01 deg 52 min 38.3 sec W.Greenwich. Now .. my interpretations, based on his coordinates. 33(deg) * 39.12104391(sec) W.Giza .. = 1290.994449 W.Giza. 51(deg) * 21(min) * 57.90154375(sec) North .. = 62012.55335 North. Centered Grid Point Value .. (62012.55335 / 1290.994449) = 48.03471728 Grid Point Value is (apparently) intended as .. exactly 1/10th of the {Munck, 1993} originally-encased Apex-Height in *regular feet*, of The Great Pyramid of Giza. {480.3471728 regular feet}. Design elements within the crop-formation suggest Circumscribed Regular Hexagon. This also resonates with Circumscribed Double-Tetrahedron, in "3-D". (48.03471728 / 19.46773764) = 2.4674011 .. = (Half Pi)^2 = (1.570796327^2) .. = (Y2K VENUS Grid Point Value) / (Y2K MARS Grid LAT) .. = 246.74011 / 100. The_19.46773764_is known as "Alternate Tetrahedral Constant", by Munck. This is the_matrix-valid_(ASM-valid) figure which approximates the 19.47122061 degrees figure. Y2K REGULUS (its Ecliptic Grid Point Value) is apparently intentionally referenced; as embedded-within the Grid LAT .. [62012.55336 / (10^3)] / 3.141592654 = 19.7392088 Thereby; The Great Pyramid of Giza is referenced again; (19.7392088 / 19.46773764) = 1.013944669 .. = (1.013211836 * 1.000723277) .. and, so; also indicated is the_center-point_of "Miami Square", as well as "King Gremlin". Another "tetrahedral" indication .. (48.03471728 * 3.141592654) .. = (8760.48194 / 57.29577951) / 10. This is where 8760.48194 is the "HD-TET Grid LAT" {Morton} and where_57.29577951_is the numerical-value of the Radian-of-arc (constant) when the_360_system is in use or is assumed. (Y2K VENUS / Y2K REGULUS) = 12.5 .. where_12.5_is the ratio of Y2K GALACTIC CENTER and Y2K SOLAR APEX. {Morton}. This is where, respectively; (246.74011 / 19.7392088) .. = (35.53057584 / 2.842446068) = 12.5 .. which, in-turn, is a decimal-harmonic of the number of Earth-years from 10,500 B.C. (Zep Tepi) to 2000 A.D. {12,500} .. and thanks to Damon Elkins. -------------------------------- The "Inanna and Lion" Ancient Artwork Depictions .. And this is something Damon Elkins has noticed, in particular, regarding his work, involving certain line-of-sight alignments having to do with "overlays" of Giza, Cydonia, and the Earth-sky as-observed-from Cairo, Egypt at December Solstice Sunrise_AT_10,500 B.C. *and*_AT_2012 A.D. There are apparently a number of ancient artworks, depicting "Inanna/Ishtar/Aphrodite/Venus" .. standing near-to, and in a kind-of "ruling-over" or "domestication-posture-over" .. a lion. D.Elkins has noticed this_same_"reference" involved in the "overlays" that I just mentioned. Hopefully .. someday .. Damon will be 'presenting' his work to the world .. (-; I just pointed-out the "12.5" ratio, (above) .. where VENUS is "over" REGULUS, in the actual mathematical expression of the ratio, itself. {Regulus is the "Heart of Leo"}. There is_also_a compelling correlation which I just noticed, involving my interpreted Grid Point Value for_this_crop-formation. If you use the {Robert Carl; revised to WGS '84 datum} Grid Point Value for STONEHENGE .. (48.03471728 / 2.920160646) = 16.44934067 .. = (Y2K VENUS / 15), or .. (246.74011 / 15). The number_15_is the ancient Sumerian {Z.Sitchin} Rank Number of .. Inanna, herself !! And if I'm not mistaken .. isn't VENUS the Roman equivalent of the Sumerian Inanna ? There's even_more_to this item. (246.74011 / 15) = (225 / 13.67835979) And that is where; 225 is the Square of 15 .. and, where; 13.67835979 is my latest-proposed Y2K Ecliptic Grid Point Value for .. NIBIRU. Plus; 225 is the "ideal-mean" number of Earth-days for the_orbit-period_of VENUS. What about .. Inanna's Sumerian Rank Number of 15 .. "over" .. the Y2K REGULUS Grid Point Value ? (15 / 19.7392088) = 0.759908877 .. which is a decimal-harmonic of the 759.908877 Y2K Ecliptic Grid LONG for .. MINTAKA, in Orion's Belt. And; you can_then_find a decimal-harmonic of MINTAKA's Y2K Ecliptic Grid LAT .. by using the_Bert Schreiber_Quantum Numbers associated with his "Segmatics" Theory .. (which is_supported_by the Circumscribed Regular Hexagon, where_360_is used in a_non-arbitrary_application in Quantum Physics). [(3.141592654 / 3) * 2.25] = 2.35619449 .. a decimal-harmonic of the_23561.9449_Y2K S.Ecliptic Grid LAT for MINTAKA. Of course .. (Pi / 3) is very "tetrahedral" .. because; (60 / 57.29577951) is "tetrahedral" .. where "60" is a "tetrahedral" angle in the_360_system. And "60" is the key to the "time-distance" encoding that has apparently been passed-down to "us" Earth- Humans by the Anunnaki (and others, as well, possibly). An_azimuth_on a "Clock-Face" of_Half Pi_Radians-of-arc .. is .. "15" time-minutes .. the "Right-Angle" azimuth, from "12-o'Clock High". If you will .. refer-back to all the_MINTAKA_correlations (and indications) that I've recently been writing-about on the Internet. (Y2K MINTAKA / Y2K REGULUS) = Half Pi .. and respectively, this is .. (31.00627668 / 19.7392088) = 1.570796327 And_1.570796327_is also the *Square-Root* of .. (Y2K VENUS Grid Point Value / Y2K MARS Grid LAT) .. = (246.74011 / 100) = (1.570796327^2) ------------------------------- Now, again; can we please get some systematic GPS-Unit readings of the crop-formations ? Such readings can be emailed to the "Grid Point" BBS Website. Thank-you .. -- Michael L.M. P.S. I would_more_than appreciate any comments from Robert Carl, here. -- Michael Lawrence Morton -------------------------- Chronos Nice... I agree... Tue Jun 24 01:33:42 2003 66.190.243.77 Michael L. Morton wrote: "33(deg) * 39.12104391(sec) W.Giza .. = 1290.994449 W.Giza. 51(deg) * 21(min) * 57.90154375(sec) North .. = 62012.55335 North. Centered Grid Point Value .. (62012.55335 / 1290.994449) = 48.03471728" Hey! That's pretty good! I think we are in splendiferous agreement on this... independent corroboration, even... I've been working with the geometry of this, based on Bertold Zugelder's diagram and a quoted figure of "100 feet" which I presume is intended to mean the diameter, and the aerial photographs: http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2003/cliffordshill/cliffords2003a.html "The Crop Circle Connector would like to thank Busty for the image. A 100 feet neat design, cut off on one side by a track." There are several departures from Bertold's initial diagram to be found in the aerial photo I think (my diagram is not 100% perfect either), for example the thickness of the outer bands may not be so similar in real life... which is the same thing I read in the figures before going back to check the photos... I think normally a grid reference reading to only +/- 10 meters and/or what could be a very loose quote on diameter, without any other information on pedigree, might be pretty precarious, but I think there's a concensus to be found there at least tentatively... These speculative estimates based on pixel measurements (scale = @ .35 feet / pixel) seem to imply the center of this crop circle is just oozing with Michael L. Morton Royal Cubits (.03 Radians feet), and was apparently premeditated by someone giving a good deal of thought to the smooth addition of radian fractions and Royal Cubit figures... where exactly do you find anyone who thinks about stuff like that more than we do here?(c) 2003 by mailto:Milamo@aol.com Michael Lawrence Morton ~ Archeocryptographer.There are a lot of generic references to circles here also, this is like a half-scaled generic circle, so to speak... You'll notice that the radius of the largest circle inside the hexagon seems to have a radius of 1 / 2 the Generic radian of 57.29577951... ? I've made a bolder circle where I think "the action" is as defined by where the vertices of the hexagon probably meet up with a circle in actuality (this is different from Bertold's diagram)... You'll also notice that for the outermost circle, the inner radius appears (to me anyway), to be the same as the inner radius of the Stonehenge Sarcen Circle... I think there's as much Stonehenge in this is there is Royal Cubits, basically... The arrangement as suggested in the diagram gives the hexagon a perimeter of 266.2867199 feet... that's a potent number, its next largest decimal harmonic was one of Silbury's Grid values in Carl Munck's Silbury model, for good reason... and it's 360 / 1.351926225... 1.351926225 being Silbury's Grid Point in WGS 84 of course... maybe I should say there's some Silbury in it too, then... A radius of 44.38111997 x 2 = 1 / 10 Square Root Volume of the Sphere 887.6223994 to which Stonehenge is so devoted mathematically... 44.38111997 / 2 = 22.19055999, actually a decimal harmonic of one of Stonehenge's WGS 84 Grid Values, Grid Longitude = 64800 / 2.920160646 = 22190.55999... Anyway, with this bold circle having a proposed radius (again, provided they are not totally pulling our legs as to data here...) 44.38111997 and a perimeter of 278.8548009 feet, and the hexagon having a proposed perimeter of 266.2867199 feet, Radian 57.29577951 / Radius 44.38111997 = 1.290994448 360* circle / circumference 278.8548009 = 1.290994448 Generic perimeter hexagon (6 Radians) 343.7746771 / perimeter 266.2867199 = 1.290994448 And as you can see, the decimal harmonic of that figure seems to be built right into the Grid Latitude of this Crop Circle according to the data "33(deg) * 39.12104391(sec) W.Giza .. = 1290.994449 W.Giza. 51(deg) * 21(min) * 57.90154375(sec) North .. = 62012.55335 North. Centered Grid Point Value .. (62012.55335 / 1290.994449) = 48.03471728" With a Grid Point of a decimal harmonic of the height of the Great Pyramid as we think of it, 480.3471728 feet, which seems almost natural because that's a customary relationship between Stonehenge's radius, which also belongs to this crop circle apparently, and the Great Pyramid's height: Radius feet 48.66934411 x (Pi^2) = 480.3471728 feet... It's actually very nice to see 1.290994449; I'm sure I don't see it often enough, because while I'm trying to hand figures points for resonating with various constants, like 1.351926225, hoping someday we might find equations that show them operating all the way up to, say, maybe the 10th or the 12th power, it's not a lot of trouble to find 1.290994449 all the way up to around the twentieth power interacting with various numbers, including some of the numbers built into this crop circle... One of the longest runs I can think of offhand involving multiple powers of 1.290994449 discloses this whole list of very significant constants, at least four of which are already pretty obviously displayed in the circle's measurements and proportions: Volume of a Torus Area of a Circle Michael L. Morton Royal Cubit Grid Longitude Stonehenge 1/2 Radian 1/2 Squared Munck Megalithic Yard Reciprocal of "Alternate Phi" Orion Belt Stars Composite "3 Pyramids" Giza Grid Point Ratio 1.027340742 And last but not least, as far as more everyday stuff goes, the highest figure in this particular chain "just so happens to be", speaking of tetrahedra and their precursors, 33.33333333 / 19.4677376... It's almost like 1.290994449 is really sort of a neglected constant and they're calling our attention to it... and I dare say its reciprocal doesn't garner quite as much credit for being a wonderprobe as 1.290994449 already could even though it is dh the sqrt 60 which is blatantly displayed at Stonehenge... In my humble opinion, someone, whoever they were, would have had half the reasons in the book for pasting a decimal harmonic of 1.290994449... If someone smarter than me about these things is trying to tell me I should be using 1.290994449 as one of my standard mathematical probes, they probably have a really, really good point... Now I could be wrong about all this, I can't offer much for pedigree for my data, came from Crop Circle Connector, end of story... and we were probably flat out lucky that the Grid Ref came so close unless it's really a rare 10-digit ref with both northings and eastings ending in zero and someone just dropped the zeros... but supposing the data is dependable... Well, what have we been saying? A: Crop circles belong to the Pyramid Matrix B: They will be placed, and proportioned accordingly C: Their metrology and proportions may be more significant than their actual geometry D: They are making continual reference to the monuments in their surrounding landscape, and particularly Stonehenge (and Giza, if they have half a chance. Case in point). E: If you simply give us a wee speck of good, actual data, we can show you this F: And you can calculate the odds whether any human "circle makers" wanted to add all these extra burdens to their bustling agendas, if you have a case for non-human origins you'd like to try to make G: This being in the case, it may be in everyone's best interest to gather and distribute the data H: Etc., etc. Are you reading our transmission? Come in... Cheers, Chronos -------------------------- Chronos Specifically... Tue Jun 24 05:15:26 2003 66.190.243.77 I wrote, "It's actually very nice to see 1.290994449; I'm sure I don't see it often enough, because while I'm trying to hand figures points for resonating with various constants, like 1.351926225, hoping someday we might find equations that show them operating all the way up to, say, maybe the 10th or the 12th power, it's not a lot of trouble to find 1.290994449 all the way up to around the twentieth power interacting with various numbers, including some of the numbers built into this crop circle... One of the longest runs I can think of offhand involving multiple powers of 1.290994449 discloses this whole list of very significant constants, at least four of which are already pretty obviously displayed in the circle's measurements and proportions: Volume of a Torus Area of a Circle Michael L. Morton Royal Cubit Grid Longitude Stonehenge 1/2 Radian 1/2 Squared Munck Megalithic Yard Reciprocal of "Alternate Phi" Orion Belt Stars Composite "3 Pyramids" Giza Grid Point Ratio 1.027340742 And last but not least, as far as more everyday stuff goes, the highest figure in this particular chain "just so happens to be", speaking of tetrahedra and their precursors, 33.33333333 / 19.4677376..." In stead of just saying so, why don't I go ahead and show some of this here? Or, first of all 1 / 1.290994449 = 7.74596669 / 10, and 7.74596669 = (sqrt 60); 1.290994449 = (sqrt 1.666666666), and 3.33333333 / 2 = 1.666666666.... 3333.333333 / 19.4677376 = 171.2234649 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^1) = dh 1.326291257 = dh (1 / 240 ) / Pi 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^2) = dh 1.02734079 "3 Giza Pyramids" Grid Point Ratio 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^3) = dh 7.95773754 = dh 25 / Pi = dh Orion Belt Stars Composite 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^4) = dh 6.164044744 = (1 / Alternate Phi 1.62231147) / 10 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^5) = 47.74648293 = 150 / Pi 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^6) = dh 3.698426665 = 1/2 (Munck Meg Yard^2) 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^7) = 28.64788977 = (Radian 57.29577951 / 2) 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^8) = 22.19055999 = Grid Longitude Stonehenge / 100 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^9) = 17.18873386 = Michael L. Morton Royal Cubit, in feet x 10 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^10) = 13.314336 = 26.62867199 / 2 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^11) = 10.31324031 = Area of A Circle / 100 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^12) = 7.9886016 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^13) = 6.18794419 = dh 108 Radians 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^14) = 4.79316096 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^15) = 3.71276651 = dh Volume of a Torus 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^16) = 2.87589659 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^17) = 2.22765991 = 1.11382995 x 2 171.2234649 / (1.290994449^18) = 1.33659594 = dh 1.181810286 x 360 x Pi Still recognizable stuff at least that far down, and what a display of Matrix data along the way... This also looks very purposeful put where these take-offs on Stonehenge, like the Clifford Hill crop circle having a common radius with Stonehenge & etc, seem to be pointing us, namely Stonehenge... I'll start this series at twice the "Matrix Valid Height" of England's tallest Cathedral (Salisbury, so I am told)... 404.0114009 ft x 2 = 808.0227996 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^1) = 625.8917693 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^2) = 484.8136799 = dh Pi / 648 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^3) = 375.5350618 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^4) = 290.8882081 = dh G.P. Rosslyn Chapel & Stonehenge Mound 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^5) = 225.3210371 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^6) = 174.5329249 = dh 1 / Radian 57.29577951 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^7) = 135.1926223 = dh Grid Point Silbury WGS 84 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^8) = 104.719755 = dh (Pi / 3) 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^9) = 81.1155734 = (Alternate Phi 1.62231147 / 2) x 100 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^10) = 62.831853012 = 2 Pi x 10 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^11) = 48.66934408 = Radius Stonehenge in feet 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^12) = 37.69911183 = 12 Pi 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^13) = 29.20160646 = Grid Point Stonehenge x 10 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^14) = 22.6194671 = ht Mycerinus Pyramid / 10 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^15) = 17.52096388 = dh Grid Values of Pyramid of Magician & Woodhenge, WGS 84 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^16) = 13.57168027 = dh Grid Lat. Chephren Pyramid x 2 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^17) = 10.512578333 = 5.256289167 x 2 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^18) = 8.143008164 = 1 / "Alt Area Vesica Piscis Ratio" 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^19) = 6.307547003 808.0227996 / (1.290994449^20) = 4.885804901 = (.7776 x Pi) x 2 & etc... at least to the 20th power... 1.290994449 is the square root of the ratio between the Radius of Stonehenge, and the 2.920160646 Grid Point of Stonehenge in the WGS 84 datum... Now what are the odds of such a choice can-opener as that, appearing in both the geographic data and the speculative geometry? As I say, someone would have half the reasons in the book to put it there, deliberately. None of this looks the least bit random to me... Cheers, Chronos -------------------------- Michael Lawrence Morton A Milestone and a Breakthrough .. Tue Jun 24 19:27:41 2003 152.163.253.97 In my opinion .. the_immediately-preceding_postings .. having to do with the_Revised_"Clifford's Hill" crop-formation (reported on 15th June, 2003) .. are a milestone and a breakthrough, in this work. I am so glad that Robert Carl included *graphics* which he's labeled with THE DIMENSIONS in REGULAR FEET .. of this crop-formation !! This is not possible to do in very many cases, so far. If we could get better measurements in the field .. then this could be done in other cases. The_*match*_in terms of the "Inner Radius" of this crop-formation (inner-edge of its outer Circle) .. and the "Inner Radius" of the Sarcen Circle of STONEHENGE, is_magnificent_in itself. {regular feet}. And the_other_figures indicated on R.Carl's graphics .. are *very* significant MATCHES, numerically, of a bunch of very important Pyramid Matrix-ASM figures. I can't over-emphasize how impressive, and how SIGNIFICANT .. this is. Again; I view this as a breakthrough, in this work. -- Michael Lawrence Morton

http://matrix-messenger.tripod.com/index.htm

http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/homepage1.html

http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm

http://disc.server.com/Indices/164905.html