Make your own free website on

Messages from Michael L. Morton

Barbury Castle 'Pinwheel' of '97 .. 'Matrix'-correlative ..

A couple of days ago as of this writing, Ron Russell (based in the USA, and one of the foremost crop-formation researchers on Earth), notified me that Paul Vigay (in the UK, and a well-respected crop formation researcher himself) now has a website that is beginning to include data for *latitude and longitude* of the formations. HURRAY !! Boisterous applause for this !! Less than half of the listed formations, 'so far', (in his data base) have this latitude and longitude data included, but I'm hoping that this *crucial data* (in my opinion) will soon become an item of "standard procedure" in crop formation data-gathering.

So ... I recommend going to ... "The International Crop Circle Database".

[ A NOTE to crop-formation researchers : I hope you'll mark the *center* of the given formation on a British Ordnance Survey Map (for UK sites) ... of scale 1 : 25000 or larger. If you're using a GPS unit, understand that magnetic anomalies in *some* formations can (and will) throw the GPS reading way-off. So I recommend doing both ... GPS and maps (or maps alone, of course). And if the GPS "fails" mysteriously ... you'll have a back-up with the maps].

I've studied a few data-sets (of lat/long) on the new database, during the past day or so. What I see, so far, looks good !! From what I can tell, from studying 3 or 4 data-sets so far (3 or 4 formations with lat/long data) ... it appears that I'm getting quite accurate correlations to the archaeomatrix .. and to the 'sky-matrix', as well !! Of course, this is a very exciting development, to say the least ... at this stage.

I will now show you what I found in one of these cases ... the Barbury Castle "Pinwheel" ... formed on April 19th, 1997 ... listed in the new database with latitude/longitude data.

Barbury Castle "Pinwheel" of April 19th, 1997

The latitude is listed as ... 51 deg 29.8 min North. Notice that the minutes are given to at least one decimal place. This is needed, because this allows us to "project" the number of *seconds* as the "nearest whole arc-second". We can multiply the "0.8" minutes .. one decimal place .. by "60" ... to get the number of 'nearest whole arc-second' ...

60 X 0.8 = 48 ... nearest whole arc-second.
So ... we have ... 51 deg 29 min 48 sec North.
The longitude is listed as ... 01 deg 46.4 min West.
0.4 X 60 = 24 .... number of 'nearest whole arc-second'.

So ... we have .. 01 deg 46 min 24 sec W.Greenwich.

Now ... at this point, we convert the longitude to the 'archaeomatrix' longitude. Carl P. Munck, Sr. re-discovered the prime meridian that passes through the center of The Great Pyramid of Giza (Munck, 1992). The longitude variance from there to the Greenwich meridian is .. 31 deg 08 min 0.8 sec ... so we convert the longitude, using that variance :

01 deg 46 min 24 sec W.Greenwich
31 deg 08 min 0.8 sec {variance}
-------------------------------------- 32 deg 54 min 24.8 sec W.Giza

We *added * the variance, in 'this' case, to the W.Greenwich longitude ... because Giza is (of course) less than 180 degrees East of the site under study.

So ... we now have .. 32 deg 54 min 24.8 sec W.Giza longitude. Next ... we calculate approximate Grid LAT and approximate Grid LONG. Again, it was the pioneer of Archaeocryptography, Carl P. Munck, Sr. ... who re-discovered the basic calculation methodology of Grid LAT and Grid LONG, which is a multiplication of the *numbers* of ... {degrees times minutes times seconds} ... of the actual precise latitude and ditto for the longitude, of a particular site or structure.

"Pinwheel" Grid LAT (approx.) ... 51 (deg) X 29 (min) X 48 (sec) North ... = "70992" North (approx.)

"Pinwheel" Grid LONG (approx.) ... 32 (deg) X 54 (min) X 24.8 (sec) W.Giza .. = "42854.4" W.Giza (approx.)

"Pinwheel" Grid POINT Value (approx.) ... 70992 / 42854.4 = 1.656 (approx.)

Then we look for signs of "specific" archaeomatrix numerical values. Obviously, at this stage of the process, it helps to have studied the literature of the new science of 'archaeocryptography'. The pioneer of this field is, as I mentioned earlier, Carl P.Munck, Sr. ... so his work is essential. At this point, his work is self-published. For info on ordering his books, tapes, newsletter, etc. ... you can go to ... ... or you can phone 1-800-243-1438.

You can also study my own work, at the following websites ...

So ... are there any 'signs' of *specific* archaeomatrix numerical values ... evident in our "approximation" figures, so far ? To me, the answer is ... yes. I recognize, in the approximate number of seconds of W.Giza longitude ... a possible reference to the Grid POINT Value (Munck, 1992) of The Great Pyramid of Giza ... "248.0502134".

Let's explore this 'sign'. 32 (deg) X 54 (min) X 24.80502134 (sec) W.Giza ... = 42863.07688 W.Giza.

Let's now try dividing by the precise Pi constant ... "3.141592654" ... my calculator has a 10-digit display, by the way ... 42863.07688 / 3.141592654 = 13643.74112 ... (??) ... well ; if at first you .. "don't succeed ... then, try, try, again" ... so let's try dividing again, a couple more times, by the precise Pi constant ... 13643.74112 / (Pi Squared) = 1382.4 ... Well, well ... I do recognize this creature !! It's a decimal harmonic of the Grid LAT of our current North Pole Star .. POLARIS ... "13824" North ... = 66 (deg) X 05 (min) X 41.89090909 (sec) North of our ecliptic.

Now, I really suspect we're "on to something" !!!

I suspect the very crafty 'circle-makers' have not only encoded the Grid POINT Value of The Great Pyramid of Giza as a decimal harmonic of the precise number of arc-seconds of "WEST GIZA" longitude ... I also suspect them of encoding the Grid LAT of POLARIS ... "within" the Grid LONG of this "Pinwheel" they created !!!

What about the latitude of the "Pinwheel" ?

Again, because I'm familiar with the archaeomatrix numbers, I do recognize that "70992" is close (relatively) to a major figure in the archaeomatrix .. 72 X (Pi Squared) X 100 ... or, "71061.15169" North ... = 51 (deg) X 29 (min) X 48.04675571 (sec) North. [ We know that "72" is the number of years it takes for one arc-degree of Earth precession ].

Next ... let's test the indicated Grid POINT Value for "matrix-resonance".

Grid POINT Value "Pinwheel" ... 71061.15169 / 42863.07688 = 1.657863991

Could this indicated figure have any "direct numerical resonance" with the "216" decimal harmonic ? I'm 'checking-out' the "216" decimal harmonic for several reasons :

1.) It is a major "gematrian" number.

2.) It's a decimal harmonic of the POLAR circumference of Earth in nautical miles.

3.) It's a decimal harmonic of the Grid POINT Value of our current North POLE Star, POLARIS .. ("21.6").

4.) It's the number of arc-degrees I found, as the *difference in longitude-variances* between the sets of prime meridians being used on Mars and Earth.

On Mars, we appear to be using (publicly) a prime meridian which is ... 09 deg 32 min 0.8 sec .... to the East of the 'planetary archeomatrix' Martian prime meridian that passes through the center of 'The D&M Pyramid' at Cydonia. Munck re-discovered the Mars prime meridian (at least the 'true' current prime meridian) in 1991. I have mentioned this many times on The Internet. As I said earlier in this article, he also re-discovered the 'true' current Earth prime meridian .. through the center of The Great Pyramid of Giza. Very recently, I was looking to find a Martian longitude-variance that would maybe "indicate itself" .. by maybe 'resonating' in some 'obvious way' with the Earth longitude-variance Munck had found. Here's what I found ...

31 deg 08 min 0.8 sec
09 deg 32 min 0.8 sec
21 deg 36 min 00 sec ... the difference in the longitude-variances.

This is precisely equal to ... "21.6" arc-degrees.

This is, of course, an "obvious" matrix-related figure ... a very MAJOR figure.

1.657863991 X "216" = 358.0986221 .. (??) ... try multiplying by the precise Pi constant ... 358.0986221 X 3.141592654 = 1125.

I recognize "1125" as an important figure. It is exactly HALF of a decimal harmonic of the "225" decimal harmonic. And "225" is the Square of "15".

And the number "15" is a BIGGIE in the 'matrix'.

For example .... "15" X 21.6 = 324 ... Square of "18". And THAT's a 'biggie'.

The self-referentiality becomes very apparent, after you study the literature.

{ By the way ... 15 + 18 = "33" }.

It seems to me that the Barbury Castle "Pinwheel" of April 19th, 1997, is displaying itself to be *intentionally and precisely correlative* to both the 'archaeomatrix' and the 'sky-matrix'.

-- Michael Lawrence Morton March 22, 2000