The Placement of Chartres Cathedral..

```
Thanks to Holger Isenberg .. for finding apparently close-enough
coordinates for me, on The Internet

I think this is a significant discovery .. because of the dramatic
correlations I've found, based on the coordinates Holger sent me
only half-a-day ago (as I write this), for this now self-evident 'matrix'
location of Chartres Cathedral.

Grid LAT  48 (deg)  X  26 (min)  X  45.58496702 (sec)  North ..
=  56890.03884  North ..
=  27.58106915  X  656.56127  X  3.141592654

Note:  this Grid LAT is exactly equal-to .. *the multiplied product* of :
1) Grid POINT Value of 'The D&M Pyramid' ..
2) Grid POINT Value of 'The Face' ..
3) A relatively precise Pi constant. { See the above }.

Munck (1992) figured out the numbers (above) for 'The Face' & 'The D&M'.

Further Note : this Grid LAT is also equal-to .. *the multiplied product* of
:
1) Original base-perimeter, in regular British Feet, of The Great Pyramid of
Giza ..
2) A relatively precise value of "6Pi".
As follows ....  3018.110298  X  18.84955592  =  56890.03884

Munck (1992) figured out the original base perimeter, in regular British
Feet,
for The Great Pyramid of Giza. He also determined that the original height
of The Great Pyramid (including capstone) was intended as ..
precisely 480.3471728 regular British Feet, in order to display an exact
ratio of "2Pi" between height and base perimeter.

'Another' Further Note : this Grid LAT is also equal-to ..
*the multiplied product* of ..
1) The precise number of regular British inches converted-from 480.3471728
regular British Feet .. { 480.3471728 X 12  =  5764.166073 } ..
2) A relatively precise value of "(Pi Squared)".
As follows .... 5764.166073  X  9.869604401  =  56890.03884

Notice :  "5764.166073" is *also* the Grid POINT Value (Munck, 1992)
of The Chephren Pyramid of Giza.
----------------------------

Grid LONG  29 (deg)  X  38 (min)  X  40.54567335 (sec)  W.Giza ..
=  44681.33203  W.Giza.
[ E.Greenwich  01 deg  29 min  20.25432665 sec ].

Note :  this Grid LONG is equal-to *the multiplied product* of ..
1) The number "3" ..
2) A relatively precise value of "(Pi Cubed)" ..
3) Original full height of The Great Pyramid of Giza (including capstone),
in regular British Feet.
As follows .... 3  X  (31.00627668)  X  480.3471728  =  44681.33203
-------------------------

Grid POINT Value  56890.03884 / 44681.33203  =  1.273239545

Notice : this Grid POINT Value for Chartres Cathedral ..
is a precise numerical match of the TANGENT of the base slope angle
of The Great Pyramid of Giza (Munck, 1992).
TAN  51.853974  =  1.273239545
This tangent is also equal-to .. exactly (4 / Pi) ..
4 / 3.141592654  =  1.273239545
-------------------------

Correlation to Location of Church @ Rennes-le-Chateau
And to the First UK Crop Formation of Year-2000 Season

Some of you will recall that I figured out the 'matrix' numbers for the
location of the Church at Rennes-le-Chateau (Morton, 1998).
I will give those numbers here ...
Grid LAT  42 (deg)  X  55 (min)  X  44.88311688 (sec)  North ..
=  103680  North .. numerically equal-to 4 Earth precession cycles in years.
{ 4  X  25920  =  103680 }.
Grid LONG  28 (deg)  X  52 (min)  X  11.33323111 (sec)  W.Giza ..
=  16501.1845  W.Giza ..
=  288  X  Radian(deg) .. or .. 288  X  57.29577951(deg).
[ E.Greenwich  02 deg  15 min  49.46676889 sec ].
Grid POINT Value for Church @ Rennes-le-Chateau ..
103680 / 16501.1845  =  6.283185307 .. a relatively precise "2Pi".

The first crop formation reported in the UK this year-2000 season,
was at Danebury Hill Fort, in Hampshire.
My figures for the centered location of that crop formation showed a
Grid POINT Value of .. "8".  I also mention, in my short article on
The Internet, that I think its design depicted a "stylized ouroboros" ..
a very ancient emblem denoting both "Kingship" .. as in 'bloodlines' ..
and "Enlightenment" .. as in 'wisdom and knowledge'.
To read that short article .. go to ..
http://www.cropcircleresearch.com/cgi-bin/CCR.cgi?a=muk00aa
( the article is about as long as its URL ).

Now ... I present you with the correlating equation :
1.273239545  X  6.283185307  =  8.
( Have you forgotten what the hell I was talking about ? ).
Don't worry ... this seems to be rather normal.
Besides .. you won't be examined .. er, I mean 'tested', on this
anytime in the near future.
---------------------------------------

The Corresponding Circa 2000 A.D. Star-positions

For those interested in additional sources of material on this
subject, I recommend the book, "On Earth As It Is In Heaven",
by Greg Rigby. He has done a lot of work in measuring the
locations of *many* of the old cathedrals in France, and has
found some very significant 'ground patterns', as if seen from
a moderately-distant 'aerial view' (say .. from orbit) ...
involving the constellations Ursa Major, Virgo, and Ursa Minor.
These 'ground patterns' are marked by the positions of certain
cathedrals in France, and the 'straight lines' connecting them.

In his book, Rigby makes the association of the star
POLARIS with the location of the Church @ Rennes-le-Chateau,
and of the Ursa Major star DUBHE with the location of
Chartres Cathedral. So .. the scale of these 'ground markings'
is huge .. hundreds of miles.

When I read Rigby's book, I went to the database I've been
using for the circa 2000 A.D. star-positions I've been researching
in connection with the "as above, so below" ancient matrix correlations.
This database uses the current star-positions, notated according to
the "Sidereal Zodiac" .. the work done by Cyril Fagan and others,
essentially up-dating our conventional (obsolete, I say) zodiac ..
to where Earth's precession has *actually brought us* at present,
in terms of the equinox positions. So .. when you see a star's
longitude notated, in this database, know that it is the 'astronomically
correct' longitude .. *not* the "Tropical Zodiac" longitude. This, it turns
out, is very important .. concerning the calculations I've been doing with
the ancient re-discovered matrix. I have been using this astronomically
correct database (re: zodiacal positions of stars) .. and then I have *also*
been further-adjusting that longitude to the actual location of the Orion
belt-star ALNITAK ... confirming (and proving, I think) Mary Anne Weaver's
theory that this particular star does, in fact, serve as the ecliptic prime
meridian marker for star-positions, as part of this ancient unified macro
(as above, so below) "matrix".

Here is the Url for this database ...
http://www.hooked.net/~sidereal/astfixst.htm

Next, I will give my 'matrix' numbers for POLARIS and DUBHE,
and remember that I'm .. in this case .. (because these 2 stars are
of "East Alnitak" longitude) 'adding-on' 03 arc-minutes and 10 arc-seconds
of longitude to the "given" figures in the database .. because ALNITAK
is 03 min 10 sec *from* the cusp of GEMINI/TAURUS ... in Taurus.

POLARIS ... circa 2000 A.D.

Grid LAT  66 (deg)  X  05 (min)  X  41.89090909 (sec)  North (of the
ecliptic) ..
=  13824  North.
Grid LONG  03 (deg)  X  53 (min)  X  4.025157233 (sec)  E.ALNITAK ..
=  640  E.ALNITAK.
Grid POINT Value  13824 / 640  =  21.6

DUBHE .. Circa 2000 A.D.

Grid LAT  49 (deg)  X  40 (min)  X  32.05706789 (sec)  North (of the
ecliptic) ..
=  62831.85307  North ..
=  (2Pi)  X  (10 to the 4th power).
Grid LONG  50 (deg)  X  30 (min)  X  30 (sec)  E.ALNITAK ..
=  45000  E.ALNITAK.
Grid POINT Value   62831.85307 / 45000  =  1.396263402

POLARIS 'TIMES' DUBHE

I'll now multiply the Grid POINT Values of these 2 stars ...
21.6  X  1.396263402  =  30.15928948  =  (9.6  X  3.141592654).
The number "9.6" is the Grid POINT Value I have calculated for
the original "Apex" location of a 'very' heavily-eroded full-scale
*analogue* of 'The D&M Pyramid' .. apparently very, very
ancient; located on Earth .. in the lower Hudson Valley region
of New York State, USA. It's remains are in the area of
Warwick, NY. I've posted my 'matrix' coordinates for this site
several times on The Internet.
Here they are, again :

Grid LAT  41 (deg)  X  16 (min)  X  17.01563963 (sec)  North ..
=  11162.2596  North ..
=  360  X  (Pi Cubed).
Grid LONG  105 (deg)  X  26 (min)  X  39.2519019 (sec)  W.Giza ..
=  107157.6922  W.Giza ..
=  3456  X  (Pi Cubed).
[ W.Greenwich  74 deg  18 min  38.4519019 sec ].
Grid POINT Value  107157.6922 / 11162.2596  =  9.6
--------------------------------

If you go to the website of my short article on the "stylized
ouroboros" crop formation (the first crop formation reported in
the UK of the year-2000 season, you will see a 'link' in the
midst of that article, which would take you to an article
containing some 'now-obsolete' information (yes, things
are changing fast these days) regarding the Earthworks
(my 'matrix' numbers for them) at Newark, Ohio, USA.
I say "now-obsolete" information, because I have now posted
my 'Second Revision' of the locational numbers of the 3 sites
involved there, on The Internet. So .. I recommend avoiding that
particular link (if you can possibly remember to do that, after
having your mind relatively 'boiled', here) .. and as an alternative,
I would have you go, instead .. to ..

http://www.farshore.force9.co.uk/mat_113.htm

As part of that 'Second Revision', I have figured a Grid LAT for
the Great Octagon of .. 2094.395102  North ..
=  40 (deg)  X  03 (min)  X  17.45329252 (sec)  North.
Notice the specific number of fractional arc-seconds
in that latitude. { 17.45329252 }.
With that in mind (if there's any storage space left),
I will now take the number "8" .. and apply it thusly ..
to the Grid POINT Value I found for DUBHE ..
1.396263402 / 8  =  0.1745329252 .. and I'll be a
chimp's nephew; I have a precise decimal harmonic
of the specific fractional number of arc-seconds in
the latitude of the Great Octagon.

Well ... that's about it (I would think) for now.

-- Michael Lawrence Morton (c) 2000 ```
-- Michael Lawrence Morton
http://www.farshore.force9.co.uk/mlmindex.htm
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm
http://mission-ignition.tripod.com