Because the (Munck, 1992) "Giza Grid POINT" .. 5577.096019 .. is so integral to this latest set of correlations (see my previous email) .. I have decided to give, here, the exact latitude and longitude figures that produce the "Giza Grid POINT".

Please refer to the graphic of the overhead-aerial-view (illustration) ..
http://homepage.aol.com/marscode/giza.html

Grid LAT 29 (deg) X 58 (min) X 24.5261363 (sec) North ..
= 41252.96125 North.

Grid LONG 7.396853329 (sec) E.Giza.
"Giza Grid POINT" Value .. 41252.96125 / 7.396853329 = 5577.096019

Note: "41252.96125" .. is the generic value for Surface Area on a Sphere ..
assuming The Radian (deg) of 57.29577951 as the_numeric_value for "given"
generic radius.

4Pi X (57.29577951 X 57.29577951) = 41252.96125 Square arc-degrees.

Note: "7.396853329" .. is (Munck, 1992) the SQUARE of ... 2.719715671 ..
which can be called, "megalithic e" ... because it is both "somewhat" close
to the "e" value of 2.718281828_and_because it is almost_identical_to the
"Megalithic Yard" of Alexander Thom .. in regular ("British") feet.

If Gravity on Earth Had Been Less ...

Just in the last couple of years, the "Earth-expansion" theory has been
gaining more creedence among geologists and paleontologists, it appears ..
from what I've read lately. I've sent out some emails regarding this theory.

What if Earth's gravity, and the actual size of Earth .. had been less, back
before the last (most recent) cataclysm of around 13,000 years ago ?
Could it be .. that the "e" value was greater, then ?
Maybe it was "exactly" .. 2.719715671 .. before the last (most recent)
expansion of Earth ?

Regardless ... the empircial evidence simply_is_what it is, today.
You cannot deny straightforward, plain empirical evidence.
And that is what backs-up the self-evident, and self-referential, reality ..
of the archaeo-sky matrix.

(c) Copyright 2001 -- Michael Lawrence Morton
http://www.farshore.force9.co.uk/mlmindex.htm
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm
http://mission-ignition.tripod.com