Matrix Message 252
Subject: "It's a lock" .. and Redundantly-So ..
From: Milamo@aol.com
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:16:21 EST
Subject: "It's a lock" .. and Redundantly-So ..
Yes ..
As I've been saying to several people for quite a while, now ..
the "ASM" is for real. It's bonafide. It's_really_there .. as of the
sky-locations
of Jan.1, 2000 in the sidereal zodiac .. using ALNITAK, the Orion
belt-star .. as a prime meridian "marker" for the ecliptic.
The database-source for these Jan.1, 2000 sky-locations ..
http://users.cwnet.com/~sidereal/mag/astfixst.htm
The evidence is simply overwhelming. And overwhelmingly redundant.
And overwhelmingly-redundantly overwhelming.
No .. I had nothing whatsoever to do with the compilation or formation
of the above database-source. In fact .. I didn't even know that such
a
database existed .. until Spring of 1999 .. when Mary Anne Weaver
suggested that I check into it. It is based directly on the
Fagan/Allen
sidereal astrological calculations .. Cyril Fagan, et al.
The first general correlation to keep-in-mind .. is that this Jan.1,
2000
"sky-matrix" is_perfectly_in-sync and mathematically-aligned with the
"Pyramid Matrix" as discovered by Carl P.Munck, Sr.
(http://www.pyramidmatrix.com)
And this fact, then .. this perfectly-precise correlation of the "Sky
Matrix"
with the "Pyramid Matrix" .. because it includes the
centered-locations of
many major structures at Cydonia on Mars .. has_already_automatically
proven the essential artificiality of these structures
in-evidence_at_Cydonia.
There's_absolutely_no question.
And_many_of the crop formations in England have ALSO_proven_themselves
to
be precisely-correlated with what I have now called .. the
"Archaeo-sky
Matrix" ..
the ASM.
Yes .. I am talking PROOF, here. And redundantly-so.
=========================
I have this feeling .. an intuition .. that the "ASM" will become
recognized
as real .. along with some of its profound implications .. by a
"critical
mass"
of humans on Earth .. at_around_the time a "critical mass" of
Americans
comes to realize that the events of "9.11" were encouraged, planned,
and
allowed to happen .. at the very_highest_Executive-branch levels of
government
in these United States. These two "critical masses" will no-doubt
overlap in
many cases (of individuals) I_wonder_how long this will take, though.
How long .. ohhh, how long ?
-- Michael L.M.
-------------------------------------------
From: Milamo@aol.com
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 22:48:05 EST
Subject: Re: [EGH] "It's a lock" .. and Redundantly-So ..
In a message dated 02/04/2002 2:06:38 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rabw@nbnet.nb.ca writes:
<< But if there IS a significant correlation between F-B and the ASM,
that's
another story. Which needs to be told and understood. Since the F-B
system is based on an ancient fudge of the longitudes of "Royal"
stars,
then this would be the clue -- the stars' harmonic relationship with
Alnitak..
and every other ASM point of interest.
And since there are many versions, using different stars, of
calibrating
constellations, each could be compared with the ASM to see if they
relate harmonically. Some or none could represent a system that is
offset from the ASM by a significant harmonic. Actually, quite a few
would -- those systems based on bright stars that are integral to the
ASM grid.
-=Rab >>
Sorry 'bout the "blank" email .. not intended.
Rab ...
I would have to say .. that it seems as if there IS a significant
relationship
between this Fagan/Bradley-based database .. and the "ASM" ..
otherwise,
I never would have_found_all these precise correlations I HAVE found.
The correlations are the result of the "nearest arc-second" numbers IN
the
database .. adjusted no less than 1/4th of an arc-second .. and
usually
less than 1/10th of an arc-second .. *amazingly* accurate .. for
"whatever"
reason(s) .. as of Jan.1, 2000 A.D. Just_extremely_uncanny, to say
the
least.
And; this is WHEN .. a_*specific*_ecliptic prime meridian is used ..
"marked" by the ecliptic longitude position of ALNITAK .. of course
relative-to
other 'prominent' stars in our Earth-sky .. and relative-to Galactic
Center
and to
Galactic Anti-Center. And the ecliptic, itself, is used as the
latitude
referent,
of course.
So; I have to conclude that apparently C.Fagan, et al .. did manage to
find
some sort of very deeply ancient 'key' to a "sky-matrix" of some
importance.
Mary Anne Weaver's theory was that ALNITAK might "prove" to be ..
'might'
prove to be .. a prime meridian "marker" for the ecliptic .. in an
analagous
way
to what Munck had discovered concerning The Great Pyramid (Giza,
Earth)
and The D&M Pyramid (Cydonia, Mars). She contacted me in February of
1999 .. and asked me if I'd be interested in investigating her theory
.. and
I
was very interested. She then did refer me to this particular
Fagan/Bradley-based
database on The Internet ..
http://users.cwnet.com/~sidereal/mag/astfixst.htm
She then contacted someone at "MAG" .. "Mission Astrology Group" ..
where the database was posted (on their website) .. to get the
appropriate
"nearest arc-second" sidereal coordinates_for_ALNITAK .. because
ALNITAK
was NOT listed in the database. So .. the idea of ALNITAK possibly
serving
as
an ecliptic prime meridian "marker" .. is the theory of Mary Anne
Weaver.
She then reported ALNITAK's Jan.1, 2000 sidereal Fagan-Bradley
coordinates
to me as .. sidereal long .. 29 Taurus 56' 50" ..
and; South of ecliptic latitude as .. (-) 25 deg 17 min 37 sec.
So; I then proceeded to test various 'prominent' stars' Jan.1, 2000
locations ..
from the_same_database. If they were within 180 ecliptic longitude
degrees
"East" of ALNITAK's location .. I would *add-on* 03 min and 10 sec ..
to
their
"nearest-arc-sec" longitudes as reported_in_this same database.
if they were within 180 ecliptic longitude degrees "West" of ALNITAK's
location,
I would *subtract* 03 min and 10 sec .. from their "nearest-arc-sec"
longitudes
as reported_in_this same database. Then .. I would multiply the
numbers ..
of (deg * min * sec) .. and I would do the same with the given
latitudes ..
the exact-same_methodology_used (Munck, "The Code", 1993) in the
"Pyramid Matrix". Finally .. I would take the ratio .. between the
Grid LONG
and the Grid LAT .. to see what "GPV" (Grid POINT Value) was
apparently
being indicated as the Jan.1, 2000 "ASM" location of a given star ..
and of
Galactic Center and Galactic Anti-Center.
The results became .. astounding. I kept doing the process .. for
major, prominent stars in the Earth-sky .. SIRIUS, POLARIS, VEGA,
REGULUS, ALDEBARAN, ANTARES, MINTAKA, ALNILAM, CASTOR,
POLLUX, SPICA, ARCTURUS, BETELGEUSE, RIGEL, ALPHA DRACONIS,
GAMMA DRACONIS, FOMALHAUT, etc.
So; for "whatever reason(s)" .. the database that Mary Anne Weaver
"happened"
to refer me to .. has turned out to be_amazingly-resonant_with the
"ASM" ..
according to testing with methodology_identical_to that used in
(Munck,
"The Code", 1993, self-published .. http://www.pyramidmatrix.com)
evaluating the centered-locations of "ground-sites" of prominence.
Significantly, as well .. many "crop formations" in the South of
England ..
have been assessed in my work .. their centered-locations, according
to
data compiled on the website of Paul Vigay ..
http://www.cropcircleresearch.com .. his "International Crop Circle
Database".
These crop-formations have_consistently_"shown themselves" to be
'centered'
according to significant "resonance" in-relationship-to the "ASM".
-- Michael Lawrence Morton
http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/homepage1.html
https://matrix-messenger.tripod.com/index.htm
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm
-------------------------------------------
From: Milamo@aol.com
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:47:34 EST
Subject: Re: [EGH] "It's a lock" .. and Redundantly-So ..
(c) 2002 by mailto:Milamo@aol.com Michael Lawrence Morton ~
Archeocryptographer. http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/homepage1.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm