Matrix Message 367
Orion Belt-stars Composite = (Mars * Jupiter) ..
Michael Lawrence Morton Orion Belt-stars Composite = (Mars * Jupiter) .. Mon Jan 20 22:50:36 2003 64.12.96.74 Would you believe it ? I'll show you the details. And .. I'll tell you .. I've_already_used this "arrangement" .. because I've had some trouble remembering my derived "ASM" AU for Jupiter. If you'll recall .. (ALNITAK * MINTAKA) / ALNILAM .. = (43.63323131 * 31.00627668) / 170.010936 .. = 7.957747155 .. which I call the "Orion Belt-stars Composite". {ASM}. Now .. even_before_I noticed the special congruence with_7.957747155_ .. I decided that 5.20456899 works better than 5.208333333 as the AU for Jupiter. (Do I sound like a 'planner' on the Solar System Creation Council, or what ?) It was only_later_that I noticed this .. (1.528992539 * 5.20456899) = 7.957747155 Mars Jupiter I mean .. "there it is". Self-evident. And there's even a "belt" between Mars and Jupiter .. just as those 3 particular Orion stars_comprise_a "belt". And that "belt" between Mars and Jupiter happens to_include_the *orbit-slot* of the former TIAMAT, IMO .. as I do agree with Zecharia Sitchin's basic thesis. And EARTH just happens to be, apparently, a "rehabbed remnant" of the former TIAMAT. Of course .. that "belt" between Mars and Jupiter_would_be a *very* important place .. historically, if-in-fact there is a NIBIRU as a companion-star to Sol, as part of a binary star-system .. and, in-which-case there have been certain 'humans' (in the Galactic sense) who have lived on one or more "planetoids" tightly orbiting this sub brown-dwarf (NIBIRU) .. and, in-which-case said 'humans' have also been on Mars_and_on the specially-rehabbed chunk of the former TIAMAT. I need to explain, again, here .. that I was inspired by being referred (by Robert Carl) to the websites which show and which attempt to explain the "Stonehenge Equation" .. also called the "Solar System Creation Equation". {{ Creation doesn't have to_automatically_connect "directly" to "God", and_by-pass_everything-and-anything ELSE_*between*_"us" Earth humans and the "Ultimate-Creator-of-All-That-Is" .. does it ?? }} I mean .. what if "humans", on an Intergalactic mode/scale .. have been around for .. ohh, say, 10 or 15 billion years ? (At least) ? I think they'd have been able to design and create star-systems .. maybe even whole galaxies .. 4 to 5 billion years ago. (Think of the Cremo & Thompson evidence .. metallic balls found in geological strata .. in-situ .. in strata 2.5_billion_years old). After all .. "we" seem to be barely scratching the surface in our re-discovery of advanced knowledge which seems to have been elegantly and redundantly encoded on EARTH .. and in the_sky_of EARTH as well. Allegedly .. someone named G.E.S. Curtis was able to come up with a certain equation (1980 ?) .. after noticing the layout of STONEHENGE. After studying this equation, recently .. I experimented with using certain "ASM" figures in-place-of certain_AU_distances indicated in this "Stonehenge Equation" of G.E.S. Curtis .. for particular planets, etc. What I found, as a result of this particular experimenting .. is more and more of the "ASM". Precise, specific, cross-correlating data .. all consistent with the "ASM". As for reference materials .. please go to .. http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/stoneequation/index.htm?mtbrand=AOL_US Also to .. http://www.geocities.com/godisreal_uk/primer.htm And also to .. http://www.geocities.com/godisreal_uk/mathone.htm ------------------------------------------------------- One major point I'd like to make, here, is .. that there_is_this "Curtis Equation" in existence .. since 1980, supposedly. In other words .. there_is_a working equation in "the literature", if you will .. *in-addition-to* the "ASM" and the "Pyramid Matrix". People have said that I'm just "making this stuff up" .. and "manipulating numbers" to "make it work out". Well .. is G.E.S. Curtis_also_just "making this up" ? Is Munck just "making this up" .. for over 20 years, now ? Please go to the above websites, and notice how closely I've "substituted" certain ASM figures .. for the "Curtis" figures. I don't think you'll be able to honestly say that I'm "stretching" it. Here are some examples of planetary AU interactions .. using particular ASM figures for AUs .. Mercury * Mars .. (0.3872983346 * 1.528992539) = 0.5921762641 .. which is a decimal-harmonic of .. the_arc-seconds-tag_on the Ecliptic longitude of South Galactic Node in the ASM .. 05(deg) * 18(min) * 59.21762641(sec) E.ALNITAK .. = 5329.586377 E.ALNITAK .. = 540 * (Pi^2). And this Ecliptic-longitude is_also_that of June Solstice of circa 2000 A.D. .. see my work on this. Venus * Jupiter .. (0.72 * 5.20456899) = (11.77245771 / 3.141592654) .. with 11.77245771 being_exactly_5 times the 2.354491542 AU for the former TIAMAT. And then you might notice that 11.77245771 is a decimal-harmonic of the_exact_RATIO of the RADIUS (in regular Feet) of the Sarsen Circle of STONEHENGE and the_360_system's Radian-arc value of 57.29577951(deg) .. (57.29577951 / 48.66934411) = 1.177245771 Mars * Uranus .. (1.528992539 * 19.2) .. = 29.35665675 = [103.68 / (Pi^4)] * 27.58106915 .. = [D.C.White House Grid LAT / (10^3)] / (Pi^4) .. * (Grid Point Value of D&M Pyramid of Cydonia on Mars). For those if you who haven't seen these, yet .. here are my ASM-AU figures for all of the planets, including the former TIAMAT. Yes .. I think the_2.354491542_also applies to NIBIRU's perihelion passage. MERCURY .. 0.3872983346 .. (Sqrt 15) / 10. VENUS .. 0.72 EARTH .. Unity .. 1 MARS .. 1.528992539 Former TIAMAT .. 2.354491542 JUPITER .. 5.20456899 SATURN .. (30 / 3.141592654) = 9.549296586 URANUS .. 19.2 NEPTUNE .. 30 PLUTO .. (2Pi)^2 = 39.4784176 -- Michael Lawrence Morton(c) 2002 by mailto:Milamo@aol.com Michael Lawrence Morton ~ Archeocryptographer.
https://matrix-messenger.tripod.com/index.htm
http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/homepage1.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm
http://disc.server.com/Indices/164905.html