Matrix Message 421
"Clifford's Hill" Crop-Form Revised
Michael Lawrence Morton
"Clifford's Hill" Crop-Form Revised
Mon Jun 23 21:23:48 2003
205.188.209.106
Please remember what I've said ..
that this is essentially "work-in-progress".
So; in a sense, I can "dismiss" the
specific "crop-formation" figures, themselves
(as "pertaining directly to this Clifford's Hill"
crop-formation) .. as a .. "false_portion_of the Alert" ..
(Part 13 of my "ALERT Series"). But .. in another sense;
I can say that I learned some things during that
"false Part-13 ALERT". And; I can also say that the
numbers, looked-at during that "false Part-13 ALERT" ..
are very much_still_valid and very important, in-and-of-
themselves as far as the_"ASM"_is concerned !!
This was instructional. AND; now .. I have_revised_the
figures for this (June, 2003) "Clifford's Hill" crop-
formation .. *specifically-based-on* Robert Carl's
mapping expertise, and .. also thanks to a_"NEW"_OS Grid
Reference which *just-very-recently* appeared on the
CropCircleConnector website, for this "Clifford's
Hill" formation. Are we learning ? I think so.
At first, the CropCircleConnector website did_not_have
the more-accurate OS Grid Ref that it now_does_have.
This greatly helped us, in our work .. because it enabled
Robert Carl to coordinate it with other mapping-
aerials. In a while, here .. you'll see how
far "off" the first "Streetmap" coordinates are/were,
and unfortunately I_followed_them .. mainly because
it seemed to me that they were more-accurate than
they_really_were .. being that it now appears that
someone forged the original OS Grid Refs in terms of
the arc-seconds. This did_not_help us.
We need a conscientious, real attempt to get it right.
This is_serious_work. Please .. stop forging coordinates
and/or OS Grid Refs. We really need_good_data, not
forged data. We are working with accuracies of within
10 feet .. or are *trying-to*, at least. We_do_work with
such accuracies in terms of locations of structures
such as Stonehenge, Silbury Hill, Avebury Circle, etc.
If you want good science, it must start in the field ..
with good, accurate measurements. We, here .. as
archaeocryptographers .. are dependent on the field-
measurements data.
I just received an email, today, as I write this,
from Robert Carl. Because of the "suddenly" *new-and-
improved* data on the_"Clifford's Hill"_crop-formation
on the Internet ("Streetmap"-linked to the
CropCircleConnector), Robert C. was able to cross-
reference (visually-via-map-graphics) and come-up with
a pair of coordinates he said would be accurate to
within "10 meters" or so. When I then looked at the
coordinates, I noticed that they are some_16_arc-seconds
different on latitude, and are some_07_arc-seconds
different on longtitude .. from the *initially-given*
coordinates on "Streetmap"-linked-to-CropCircleConnector.
16 arc-seconds difference on latitude !! .. that's
more than a_quarter_of an arc-minute !!
That's well-over 1600_feet_"off". This is outrageously
sloppy forgery.
07 arc-seconds "off" on longitude .. that's
about 430 feet off, or so.
What we'd like is .. some sort of systematic GPS-Unit
readings to be taken .. as a matter of routine
procedure. Most decent GPS-Units will give readings
good to within 3 meters or so. Please.
--------------------------------
REVISED-CORRECTED .. "Clifford's Hill" Crop-formation ..
Reported on 15th June, 2003 .. All Cannings, Wiltshire.
Robert Carl today (23rd June, 2003) sent me an email
with his coordinates (see above references to this)
for this "Clifford's Hill" crop-formation.
"To within 10 meters" ..
51 deg 21 min 57.9 sec North.
01 deg 52 min 38.3 sec W.Greenwich.
Now .. my interpretations, based on his coordinates.
33(deg) * 39.12104391(sec) W.Giza ..
= 1290.994449 W.Giza.
51(deg) * 21(min) * 57.90154375(sec) North ..
= 62012.55335 North.
Centered Grid Point Value ..
(62012.55335 / 1290.994449) = 48.03471728
Grid Point Value is (apparently) intended as .. exactly
1/10th of the {Munck, 1993} originally-encased Apex-Height
in *regular feet*, of The Great Pyramid of Giza.
{480.3471728 regular feet}.
Design elements within the crop-formation suggest
Circumscribed Regular Hexagon. This also resonates
with Circumscribed Double-Tetrahedron, in "3-D".
(48.03471728 / 19.46773764) = 2.4674011 ..
= (Half Pi)^2 = (1.570796327^2) ..
= (Y2K VENUS Grid Point Value) / (Y2K MARS Grid LAT) ..
= 246.74011 / 100.
The_19.46773764_is known as "Alternate Tetrahedral
Constant", by Munck. This is the_matrix-valid_(ASM-valid)
figure which approximates the 19.47122061 degrees figure.
Y2K REGULUS (its Ecliptic Grid Point Value) is
apparently intentionally referenced;
as embedded-within the Grid LAT ..
[62012.55336 / (10^3)] / 3.141592654 = 19.7392088
Thereby; The Great Pyramid of Giza is referenced
again; (19.7392088 / 19.46773764) = 1.013944669 ..
= (1.013211836 * 1.000723277) .. and, so; also
indicated is the_center-point_of "Miami Square", as
well as "King Gremlin".
Another "tetrahedral" indication ..
(48.03471728 * 3.141592654) ..
= (8760.48194 / 57.29577951) / 10.
This is where 8760.48194 is the "HD-TET Grid LAT"
{Morton} and where_57.29577951_is the numerical-value
of the Radian-of-arc (constant) when the_360_system
is in use or is assumed.
(Y2K VENUS / Y2K REGULUS) = 12.5 ..
where_12.5_is the ratio of Y2K GALACTIC CENTER
and Y2K SOLAR APEX. {Morton}.
This is where, respectively;
(246.74011 / 19.7392088) ..
= (35.53057584 / 2.842446068) = 12.5 ..
which, in-turn, is a decimal-harmonic of the number of
Earth-years from 10,500 B.C. (Zep Tepi) to 2000 A.D.
{12,500} .. and thanks to Damon Elkins.
--------------------------------
The "Inanna and Lion" Ancient Artwork Depictions ..
And this is something Damon Elkins has noticed, in
particular, regarding his work, involving certain
line-of-sight alignments having to do with "overlays"
of Giza, Cydonia, and the Earth-sky as-observed-from
Cairo, Egypt at December Solstice Sunrise_AT_10,500 B.C.
*and*_AT_2012 A.D.
There are apparently a number of ancient artworks,
depicting "Inanna/Ishtar/Aphrodite/Venus" .. standing
near-to, and in a kind-of "ruling-over" or
"domestication-posture-over" .. a lion.
D.Elkins has noticed this_same_"reference" involved
in the "overlays" that I just mentioned.
Hopefully .. someday .. Damon will be 'presenting'
his work to the world .. (-;
I just pointed-out the "12.5" ratio, (above) ..
where VENUS is "over" REGULUS, in the actual
mathematical expression of the ratio, itself.
{Regulus is the "Heart of Leo"}.
There is_also_a compelling correlation which I just
noticed, involving my interpreted Grid Point Value
for_this_crop-formation.
If you use the {Robert Carl; revised to WGS '84 datum}
Grid Point Value for STONEHENGE ..
(48.03471728 / 2.920160646) = 16.44934067 ..
= (Y2K VENUS / 15), or .. (246.74011 / 15).
The number_15_is the ancient Sumerian {Z.Sitchin}
Rank Number of .. Inanna, herself !!
And if I'm not mistaken .. isn't VENUS the Roman
equivalent of the Sumerian Inanna ?
There's even_more_to this item.
(246.74011 / 15) = (225 / 13.67835979)
And that is where; 225 is the Square of 15 ..
and, where; 13.67835979 is my latest-proposed
Y2K Ecliptic Grid Point Value for .. NIBIRU.
Plus; 225 is the "ideal-mean" number of Earth-days for
the_orbit-period_of VENUS.
What about .. Inanna's Sumerian Rank Number of 15 ..
"over" .. the Y2K REGULUS Grid Point Value ?
(15 / 19.7392088) = 0.759908877 ..
which is a decimal-harmonic of the 759.908877 Y2K
Ecliptic Grid LONG for .. MINTAKA, in Orion's Belt.
And; you can_then_find a decimal-harmonic of MINTAKA's
Y2K Ecliptic Grid LAT ..
by using the_Bert Schreiber_Quantum Numbers associated
with his "Segmatics" Theory .. (which is_supported_by the
Circumscribed Regular Hexagon, where_360_is used in
a_non-arbitrary_application in Quantum Physics).
[(3.141592654 / 3) * 2.25] = 2.35619449 ..
a decimal-harmonic of the_23561.9449_Y2K S.Ecliptic
Grid LAT for MINTAKA.
Of course .. (Pi / 3) is very "tetrahedral" ..
because; (60 / 57.29577951) is "tetrahedral" ..
where "60" is a "tetrahedral" angle in the_360_system.
And "60" is the key to the "time-distance" encoding
that has apparently been passed-down to "us" Earth-
Humans by the Anunnaki (and others, as well, possibly).
An_azimuth_on a "Clock-Face" of_Half Pi_Radians-of-arc ..
is .. "15" time-minutes .. the "Right-Angle" azimuth,
from "12-o'Clock High".
If you will .. refer-back to all the_MINTAKA_correlations
(and indications) that I've recently been writing-about
on the Internet.
(Y2K MINTAKA / Y2K REGULUS) = Half Pi ..
and respectively, this is ..
(31.00627668 / 19.7392088) = 1.570796327
And_1.570796327_is also the *Square-Root* of ..
(Y2K VENUS Grid Point Value / Y2K MARS Grid LAT) ..
= (246.74011 / 100) = (1.570796327^2)
-------------------------------
Now, again; can we please get some systematic
GPS-Unit readings of the crop-formations ?
Such readings can be emailed to the "Grid Point" BBS
Website.
Thank-you ..
-- Michael L.M.
P.S. I would_more_than appreciate any comments from
Robert Carl, here.
-- Michael Lawrence Morton
--------------------------
Chronos
Nice... I agree...
Tue Jun 24 01:33:42 2003
66.190.243.77
Michael L. Morton wrote:
"33(deg) * 39.12104391(sec) W.Giza ..
= 1290.994449 W.Giza.
51(deg) * 21(min) * 57.90154375(sec) North ..
= 62012.55335 North.
Centered Grid Point Value ..
(62012.55335 / 1290.994449) = 48.03471728"
Hey! That's pretty good! I think we are in splendiferous agreement on this... independent
corroboration, even...
I've been working with the geometry of this, based on Bertold Zugelder's diagram and a
quoted figure of "100 feet" which I presume is intended to mean the diameter, and the
aerial photographs:
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2003/cliffordshill/cliffords2003a.html
"The Crop Circle Connector would like to thank Busty for the image. A 100 feet neat
design, cut off on one side by a track."
There are several departures from Bertold's initial diagram to be found in the aerial
photo I think (my diagram is not 100% perfect either), for example the thickness of the
outer bands may not be so similar in real life... which is the same thing I read in the
figures before going back to check the photos...
I think normally a grid reference reading to only +/- 10 meters and/or what could be a
very loose quote on diameter, without any other information on pedigree, might be pretty
precarious, but I think there's a concensus to be found there at least tentatively...
These speculative estimates based on pixel measurements (scale = @ .35 feet / pixel) seem
to imply the center of this crop circle is just oozing with Michael L. Morton Royal Cubits
(.03 Radians feet), and was apparently premeditated by someone giving a good deal of thought
to the smooth addition of radian fractions and Royal Cubit figures... where exactly do you
find anyone who thinks about stuff like that more than we do here?
(c) 2003 by mailto:Milamo@aol.com Michael Lawrence Morton ~
Archeocryptographer.
https://matrix-messenger.tripod.com/index.htm
http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/homepage1.html
http://www.greatdreams.com/gem1.htm
http://disc.server.com/Indices/164905.html
